THE UNIVERSITY welcomed the new academic year—and its Quadricentennial—on a high note by securing the 101st spot in the annual listing of Asia’s Top 200 Universities by the London-based Times Higher Education-Quacquarelli-Symonds (THE-QS), UST was tied with Japan’s Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology and Thailand’s Prince of Songkla University. Last year, it placed 144th.
De La Salle University trailed behind UST at 106, while no significant changes were seen im the rankings of Ateneo de Manila University and University of the Philippines, which landed 58th and 78th, respectively.
In the field of Social Sciences, the University fell from 75 last year to 83 this year. It also declined in Arts and Humanities, dropping from 55 to 69.
However, UST went notches higher from 85 to 69 in Biomedicine.
But still, the Asian rankings placed UST behind Ateneo in Life Sciences and Biomedicine despite the fact that UST offers more courses, dominates licensure exams, and is the acknowledged pioneer in the field.
Commenting on the results of the survey, Prof. Fortunato Sevilla, member of Malacanang’s Presidential Coordinating Council on Research and Development and former dean of the College of Science, said UST should be thankful that it got into the survey.
“We should be happy about (landing 101st). At least UST has been acknowledged. Imagine how many universities there are in Asia. Last year, UP and Ateneo complained because of their rankings. I think we should view this in a positive light and try to be happy about where we stand now,” he said.
Hong Kong schools got the first two spots: University of Hong Kong,followed by the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.
Neighboring countries have more schools in the Top 200 than the Philippines: Taiwan has 17, India 12, Malaysia six, and Indonesia six.
Countries which dominated the Top 20 include Japan with eight schools, South Korea with four, Singapore with two, China with two, and Hong Kong with four.
The criteria were global academic peer review (30 percent), citations per faculty (20 percent), student faculty ratio (20 percent), global employer review (10 percent), international faculty(five percent), international students(five percent).
UST failed to get a slot in Natural Sciences and the Information Technology and Engineering categories.
This year saw Ateneo took the lead on each area among Philippine schools except in Life Sciences and Biomedicine, and Social Sciences. UST dropped behind the three Philippine universities in Social Science and Arts and Humanities with scores of 16.20 percent and 17.90, respectively.
But among the Philippine schools, UST was the most improved overall. This was due to the fact that UST landed in the top 10 in one key criterion, citations per faculty. In fact, it placed eighth in the criterion.
“Our researches are entered in the Scopus,” said Fr. Arthur Dingel,O.P., assistant to the Rector for planning and management. “Scopus is a kind of journal wherein all the scientific researches around the world is entered. If we can get to be published in the journal then that would mean added points for us. But the thing is, this year we did not meet the deadline for the journals. We are still in the process of reapplying. If granted, maybe our rank will go higher.”
In the Recruiter Review category, all Philippine schools showed declines in their ranks. UP ranked 22nd (from 10), Ateneo 25th (from 11), La Salle ranked 29th (from 15) and UST 59th (from 21). According to the Asian University Rankings website, the Recruiter Review is like the Academic Peer Review.
But UST’s Waterloo remains Academic Peer Review.
UST landed 90th. Both UP and Ateneo improved their positions, ranking 23rd and 24th, respectively. La Salle fell from 70 to 72.
“There is such a thing as Academic Peer Review wherein deans and presidents of different universities are given survey forms to answer,” Father Dingle explained. “Their questions mainly revolve on what school pioneered in the field of health related sciences and medicine and nursing. The choice of each person would depend heavily on what school advertises the most. UST is still new in this system.”
In International Faculty and Students, no Philippine university figured.
Other local universities figured in some categories. In the Student to Faculty Category, the University of South Eastern Philippines rose from zero to No. 43.
In the category of Student Exchange Inbound, the University of San Carlos and Ateneo de Manila placed 53rd (from 39) and 48th (from 56), respectively.
“Right now we are trying to pattern the University’s website to suit the qualifications of the THE-QS,” Dingle said. “We do hope that our combined efforts in advertising our University would soon bear fruit.” Monica N. Ladisla
Readers' comments posted in this site do not necessarily reflect the editorial position of the Varsitarian. The Varsitarian does not knowingly publish false information and may not be held liable for the views of readers exercising their right to free expression.
kaya kayo kulelat sa THE-QS
UST deserves its present ranking
Hay..
pasensYa na bitter laNg ako
USTE
More Improvement
It takes a lot more than improvements in infrastructure and facilities in order to become competitive at a global scale.
We need improvements in the academic system, in research, in our faculties and colleges.
Even small changes can make a huge impact...
Why not open our library 24/7? Just like they do in universities in Singapore and China?
Why not limit classroom size to 20 students per professor. At least for critical major subjects?
Why not work on UST's marketing and image?
Why not allow students to pursue their individual interests in other academic disciplines? that is, allow more flexibility in the courses that students are allowed to take and giving more power for the student to choose subjects they are interested in.
Why not offer new innovative and relevant courses, classes, and subjects?
Why not send more teachers and studies abroad to gain more knowledge and experience?
Why not become more hands on in terms of nation building?
The true measure of a good university is one that contributes to the fulfillment of potentials. The potential of individuals, societies, and of nations.
That's very encouraging to know.
Ano ba mga kurso sa Ateneo?
HA?
Wait a sec
Now, to our friend who lambasted the courses offered in Ateneo. Being a Catholic, Jesuit, Filipino university that it is, the Ateneo capitalizes on valuing the Jesuit training - which is strongly believe (and this with no judgment) is quite different from a Dominican one. The Ateneo believes in the holistic formation of the students, well-trained in academics and in formation and social concern. That is how we embody the big words such as cura personalis and magis (look it up!). We do not believe in focusing increasing your QPI for the simple reason that it does not and should not define you as a person. Life, moreover, is not about studying; it is about learning.
Moreover, clearly, you failed to recognize the multiverse of rationality in a given society. Living in this monolithic idea or perception regarding any subject does not lead you any further. I do hope your philosophy classes make you read the works of Derrida, Scheler and Habermas to break you open from the den you secluded yourself in.
I do value your insights as we believe in dialogue than in apologetic (which I do think is highly promoted in your university, truth be told and objectively that is). But summing up my points, know what you are talking about.
Have a good day.
relax lang
1st?
Where is the love?
It's great that UST is getting more acknowledgement for its contributions. We Thomasians should keep it up, there's still a long way to go.
Just to share; I passed the UP, ADMU, DLSU, and UST Entrance Exams but I chose to study in UST because I wanted to be an Architect and I felt that UST-CA had the best program for me.
It's definitely true that UST had the easiest entrance exam out of the 4, but what I've learned most from my college experience is that the quality of each student is not solely based on scores.
I think it's wonderful that there are 12,000 students on-campus. It makes for a very diverse student body. You get to know and learn from people from all walks of life. Mayaman man o mahirap, from the academically competent to the academically challenged.
As the largest Catholic University in the world, we are home to more than 200 student organizations including the world-renowned UST Singers, the Sallinggawi Dance Troupe, the Varsitarian, and some of the finest athletes in the UAAP League.
I believe that there's a right school for every Filipino student. There's no such thing as "The best school in the Philippines". Each university has its own strengths and weaknesses. What is important is to learn from our own mistakes, and exert effort in correcting what is wrong in our own internal systems.
Why are we pulling each other down? Instead of competing with each other, why not compete with the world? Philippine Universities still have a long way to go...
I AGREE
we are still third world quality
Oops Sorry
However, I do think UST could still very much improve on it's quality of instruction by reducing the number of students per class.
I do believe that decreasing the student-to-professor ratio could very much improve the quality of instruction. In our college for example, sometimes there are more students than seats and/or desks in the classroom. For lab subjects the norm should be 20 instead of 40-50 students maximum per instructor.
I love UST to bits but sometimes I just can't help but feel that for the 56,000 php our parents are paying each sem, we aren't getting our money's worth...
If the University is accepting 12,000 freshmen each year, it needs to fulfill its obligations to each one and offer the best possible education and service that each student is entitled to. Kaya naman eh...
What we need are new and innovative programs in our University that are both relevant and cutting-edge. We need to diversify the faculty as well. Hire faculty that are Graduates not just of UST but of different Schools and Universities from all over the Philippines or even abroad, and we will have a wider pallet of ideas to share with our country and with the world.
We have some of the finest and most beautiful collections of art and literature in the country. Why is only 2% of the UST Museum of Arts and Sciences on display at the Main Building? Let us share it with the whole Philippines and the world.
We hail from a 400 year old tradition, the oldest in Asia, and count ourselves as some of the finest breed of Filipinos. May that statement be as true then and now as it will be always. Viva Santo Tomas!
HAS TENEBRAE CINGUNT MENTIS
HAS TENEBRAE CINGUNT MENTIS CALIGINE TERRAS HOC SANCTI THOMAE UNIVERSITATES OPUS: LUMINA PANDIT
The English translation thus read: “Darkness covers this land in a mental mist. This is the task of the University of Santo Tomas: to spread the light.”
I think this is the reason why UST accepts average students. UST is tasked with spreading the light of education... That is UST's commitment since the very beginning...
how can an institution spread the light of quality education if it will cater only for the elite?
The difficulty level of an entrance examination is not the basis of quality education...
UST accepts average students and turn them to excellent individuals... UST can turn lead into gold
Lumina Pandit
HAS TENEBRAE CINGUNT MENTIS CALIGINE TERRAS HOC SANCTI THOMAE UNIVERSITATES OPUS: LUMINA PANDIT
The English translation thus read: “Darkness covers this land in a mental mist. This is the task of the University of Santo Tomas: to spread the light.”
I think this is the reason why UST accepts average students. UST is burdened with spreading the light of education... That is UST's commitment since the very beginning...
The difficulty level of an entrance examination is not the basis of quality education...
UST accepts average students and turn them in to excellent individuals... UST turns lead into gold...
hindi man lang nga kasali ang
di naman...
Bias
ha?!
Are you for real? Really?
Pahiya na naman ang
The result of the QS World
Mga atenista parang latang
Huwag na patulan ang mga
The problem with UST is their
Who really cares? Now, really?
jUST cares for the Filipono people.
Let's say that you are right
so what if we were mediocre at the start?
Patrice:
Your statements are
what do you mean? pa
Is that what you have learned
duh
"Truth hurts"?
Excuse me
Really?
Is there a big 3 ? since
UST is still the school for the Dumb and BIG 3 rejects
Are You Educated?
you wish!
They didn't take it because
Bluestrikes your are so
Kamangmangan
"Hindi maiiwasan sa online forums ang pagpapataasan ng ihi ng mga estudyante mula sa magkakaibang pamantasan. Minsang nagbabasa ako, isang pahayag ang nakapagpanting sa tainga ko. Aniya, hindi raw dapat ikumpara ang UST sa umano’y “Big Three” na mga pamatasan sa Katipunan, Diliman at Taft dahil sa “less stellar alumni roster” ng UST. Natawa na lamang ako.
Payo ko lamang sa kaniya (sakaling mabasa niya ito), subukan niya munang magsaliksik bago siya magbitiw ng “kamangmangan.” Hindi malayong Tomasino pala ang propesor na nagbibigay ng “de kalidad” na edukasyon sa kanilang pamantasan."
From http://www.varsitarian.net/editorial_opinion/opinion/20091006/kamatayan_at_kamangmangan
Hahaha
who believes in thes ranking?
thank you